I belong to the Sierra Club and support most of the environmental stands they take. However, they also have a way of shooting themselves in the foot, publicly. Take the January-February issue of Sierra magazine. In that publication Paul Rauber questions removing wolves from Wyoming’s endangered species list. He declares that vultures are responsible for 0.3% of cattle losses. Vultures, or buzzards, as my family always called them, clean up after the death of a bovine; they do not kill or injure cattle. Rauber’s statistics come from the US Department of Agriculture.
Two wrongs don’t make a right.
Subscribe now to access our entire site—only $25 for 1 year.
For login info, please check your email after signing up. If it's not there, check your spam folder. If it's still not there, e-mail us.
Rather pay with a check? No problem— e-mail and let us know.
Or, sign in here if you're already a subscriber.
For login info, please check your email after signing up. If it's not there, check your spam folder. If it's still not there, e-mail us.
Rather pay with a check? No problem— e-mail and let us know.
Or, sign in here if you're already a subscriber.